View Single Post
Old 08-02-2019, 03:50 PM   #24 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,442

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,207
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird View Post
I'm not positive how it works but I think that 85 octane is the same exact gas they sell at 87 in Washington and Oregon it just gets labeled the lower rating because of the average elevation
That was the opposite of my understanding, that MT 85 is 85 PON, but it has similar resistance to burning at elevation as 87 PON at sea level. Lower atmospheric pressure > lower air density > lower compression heat > lower risk of detonation.

We all observe that the higher the octane rating, the higher the price of fuel, so my assumption is that 85 PON is cheaper to produce.

I run 85 PON when I'm in MT, but then I fill up with "premium" as I head out, prior to descending back to sea level.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote