View Single Post
Old 08-14-2019, 03:03 PM   #6496 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
aerohead's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,304
Thanks: 23,414
Thanked 6,920 Times in 4,415 Posts
heard of any of these

Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Climate gate 1 and 2.
Then there was climate gate 3 but that was down graded to gross scientific misconduct.
Any belivers who haven't heard of any of these chose to bury their heads in the sand and pretend everything is perfect.
Even if you ignore the fraud there is the funding bias, where it's been proven by the sugar industry of all places that scientific studies are more likely to end with favorable results to the entity that supplied the funding.
Again,you'll better argue your case if you provide us with the prima facie evidence.
Who,what,when ,where,why,and who paid for it.
Photobucket album: