View Single Post
Old 08-22-2019, 12:35 AM   #6 (permalink)
modified metro
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Indiana
Posts: 14

The black one - '99 Chevy Metro Base
90 day: 40.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 9
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman455 View Post
That^.

Unfortunately, despite its complication coast down testing is still probably the most viable means of aerodynamic testing for enthusiasts like us. The instructable is a very approximated version, so it will only give you a general idea of drag coefficient and rolling resistance coefficient. Some things you could do to improve accuracy:
-following SAE J1263, do it on a day with wind speeds <10 mph and 10 runs total (5 in each direction) for any one configuration
-take a photo of your car from a distance and get an accurate cross-sectional area measurement rather than estimating
-weigh it on a truck scale and get a reasonably accurate curb weight rather than estimating
-use as flat a road as you can find, throw out any runs with traffic interference and redo them
That is what I did the last time I did a coast down test, except I only did 3 runs in each direction.

I use the national weather service to find a day when winds are calm.

We have a truck scale at work tha I can use to get the weight to within 20 lbs.

I know of a pretty flat road to do the coast down test on.

The cross sectional measurement I can probably get from the last coast down test I did.

This is a copy of the last coast down test I did.

Click image for larger version

Name:	coast down test metro.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	98.5 KB
ID:	26731
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to modified metro For This Useful Post:
aerohead (08-24-2019)