View Single Post
Old 08-29-2019, 02:00 PM   #31 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,471

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,214
Thanked 4,391 Times in 3,365 Posts
The reactor itself doesn't even need to be capable of utilizing the degraded fuel. Other reactors in other locations could be built to utilize the degraded fuel and receive it from the primary reactors at a reduced cost, free, or even have the primary sources pay the secondary reactors to take it.

There could be a series of reactors that utilize lower and lower grades of fuel until it no longer makes economic and environmental sense to further "burn" the fuel, at which point it finally gets stored at a much less radioactive state, or gets processed to remove the fissile material from the non-fissile material. Isn't it easier to get fissile material from used rods than to dig it out of the ground?

MODS- can we have post #27 on put in a different thread, perhaps this one:

https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...ide-36723.html

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!

Last edited by redpoint5; 08-29-2019 at 02:09 PM..
  Reply With Quote