View Single Post
Old 09-24-2019, 02:28 PM   #328 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,438

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,207
Thanked 4,387 Times in 3,361 Posts
I love lamp graphs.







Seems petroleum consumption has way more to do with economic factors than it does with efficiency laws.

Do people setting CAFE MPG targets understand physics and economics, or do they arbitrarily set the targets? The law of diminishing returns applies to everything, and going from 15 MPG to 30 is orders of magnitude easier than going from 30 to 60.

This image which projects future MPG based on proposed CAFE standards shows the opposite of diminishing returns; that it will somehow get easier to improve fuel economy; that the low hanging fruit was left for the end and that we started with the hardest hanging fruit.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!

Last edited by redpoint5; 09-24-2019 at 02:33 PM..
  Reply With Quote