View Single Post
Old 09-25-2019, 01:41 PM   #353 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,460

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Awesome post JSH, thanks for taking the time to articulate it so well.

This further underlies my point about the absurdity of targeting particular MPGs though. If the goal is reduced CO2, this is a roundabout way to do so. The goal isn't to burn less fuel per mile precisely, but to reduce overall fuel consumption. An aspect of this is to burn less per mile, but also traveling less miles, or chosing alternative transportation methods are other possible solutions (among many).

MPGs as a measure of efficiency is absurd in the first place, because it doesn't intuitively represent the relative fuel savings. Going from 10 MPG to 20 saves way more fuel than going from 20 MPG to 30 even though both represent an improvement of 10 MPG.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote