View Single Post
Old 09-25-2019, 05:11 PM   #355 (permalink)
freebeard
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 29,002
Thanks: 8,232
Thanked 9,003 Times in 7,437 Posts
Quote:
Litres/100km is the most logic way, at least in my opinion.
Where does this miles per gallon come originally?
It's more helpful than hogsheads per furlong?
Quote:
People complained that cars didn't get anywhere near the rated fuel economy. So EPA tweaked their numbers buy running the CAFE numbers through an equation to get a more realistic number. It was still high and people still complained. This cycle has repeated over the past 4 decades so that today the combined fuel economy on the window sticker is about 25% lower than CAFE.
The tyranny of low expectations.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

________________
.
.
Because much of what is in the published literature is nonsense,
and much of what isn’t nonsense is not in the scientific literature.
-- Sabine Hossenfelder
  Reply With Quote