Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
It's not necessarily a conscience or overt objective, but rather a consequence of causing division among people. You'll have to go back to my "us" vs "them" comment to follow along the thought train that leads to violence.
We tend to think violence erupts up out of nowhere, or very suddenly, when the reality is that we get there step by step, either as a consequence of planned action (WWII Nazis), or as a consequence of our inability to understand that division/disgust (pre Nazis) is the road toward violence.
Nazis didn't kill people, they killed "infestations". There's a process to converting people like me and you into infestations.
I'm not saying people like Soph and Greta are motivated toward violence; only that it's a possible outcome from having a character of division. As Peterson would say, lets not take the first step in the first place, even if it might not end up with people at eachothers throats.
|
'Next door neighbors loaned me a book by Jimmy Carter.In the back of the book was a copy of the CAMP DAVID ACCORDS of 1978
Here are some of the talking points:
Framework for peace
Meetings
Agreements
Invitation to adherence
Peaceful settlement of conflict
Coexistence
Cooperation
Initiative
Proposals by leaders
This generation & future generations to be spared trajedies
Negotiations
Provisions & principles
Respect
Rights
Reconciliation
Promoting economic development
Maintain stability
Assuring security
Monitoring
Objectives
Procedure
Representatives-delegations-inhabitants
Resolution
Orderly transfer-transition
Timetable
Arrangements
Responsibilities
Withdrawal
Joint participation
Final status
Committees
Resolve
Solution
Legitimate right
Just requirements
Participation in determinations
Joint agreement
Vote by elected representatives
Joint participation
Establishment of agreed procedures
Implementation
Peaceful settlement of disputes
Good faith negotiating
Obligations
Full recognition and normalization of relations
Protection under due process of law
Exploration of economic development potentials/possibilities as a common goal
Mutual settlement of all claims financial
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Not a bad starting place.No violence.
My take on climate change is,that it's really not about the science at all,but rather the implications to investments should we act on the issue.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ruppert says it takes 30-years to transition to a new energy paradigm,and that's basically what the scientists are talking about.I don't see any structural nor technological impasse.