View Single Post
Old 09-27-2019, 01:51 AM   #49 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,869

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,338
Thanked 4,492 Times in 3,455 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
I still take shale with a grain of salt. I'm still more favorable to increase the usage of biofuels in order to add value to agricultural residues and ease the closure of the carbon and nitrogen cycles.
Sure, I don't know the differences in cost to produce a given quantity of energy, but I'd be more favorable to ethanol if the US could grow cane sugar as easily as Brazil too. Corn is way less efficient, and we get less sunlight.

Has anyone done an analysis on what the cost per unit of energy and potential energy per unit of land is between say, a field full of corn for ethanol, and that same field full of solar panels, or concentrated solar energy?

I know solar is somewhere around 20% efficient, but how efficient is corn at converting sunlight into useful energy, and then how much energy is lost in cultivating and extracting that energy?
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote