View Single Post
Old 09-27-2019, 12:28 PM   #7121 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,861
Thanks: 23,922
Thanked 7,207 Times in 4,640 Posts
IPCC

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Their conservative trends seem agreeable on this latest report.
Right now I'm reading their latest 1170 page report right now.
Lots of cherry picking, some invalid sample sizes and a little hyperbole that the retards like AOC blow way out of proportion.
No one saying anything that would indicate the planet will be much more hostile even going out 300 years even with the cherry picking.
Something to consider.In order to get a report together for publishing,there's a cut-off date,after which no new information can be accepted.This has meant up to 24-months in the past,making the published data obsolete on the day it's released.
Also,the IPCC has a 'range' of outcomes,predicated upon percentages of probability.Unless,as you are doing,reading the entire manuscript,most will be unaware for instance,that there's a higher likelihood that the average global temperature increase will reach 11-degrees F(4-C) by 2100,than you'll be involved in a traffic accident,or your home catching fire.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
 
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (09-27-2019)