View Single Post
Old 09-27-2019, 03:42 PM   #7132 (permalink)
redneck
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,611

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 208
Thanked 1,252 Times in 640 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Please bear in mind,that under UN,IPCC framework protocols,both China and India,as defined as 'undeveloped' nations,are exempt from certain emissions restrictions,until they attain industrial parity.They are fully authorized to build and operate the coal-fired power plants.
In the meantime,they've already exceeded the Paris Agreement,left us in the dust,with respect to alternate energy,electric car adoption,etc..The United States is the backwards nation now.
If AGW climate change was as dire as the UN/IPCC and believers say it is. It should have been an immediate “Cease and Desist Order”, not a authorization to continue to add to the problem.

The fact that they are not held to the same standard is very telling. It means that it’s probably B.S. to begin with.

What it is really about is money... (collecting money)

China - India - 3rd world = poor.... Western and 1st world = rich...

After all you can’t get blood from a turnip...

And control... (controlling where and who the money is distributed to )


The rest of your post is nothing other than optics and cover for them not addressing this.

In reality, the truth is that China and India would laugh at the UN/IPCC and tell them to go pound sand if they tried to make them play (pay) along. The UN/IPCC knows this, therefore they get a pass.




>
 
The Following User Says Thank You to redneck For This Useful Post:
aerohead (09-27-2019)