Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
It must be you, I see Audi.
|
Yep, or also a Porsche 924, same difference. 
Those intake ports might go under Aerodynamic Oddities.
The front more or less represented the style of the times. And considering the most commonly owned auto brand among designers is Porsche, I see more 924.
https://jalopnik.com/you-wont-believ...dge-1503653955
https://auto.howstuffworks.com/porsche-924-history3.htm
Quote:
|
The Porsche 924 Turbo went on sale in the U.S. in 1980 to critical acclaim.
|
https://auto.howstuffworks.com/porsche-924-history2.htm
Quote:
|
Though aerodynamics was not a major concern in the early Seventies, the 924’s coefficient of drag (Cd) was a claimed 0.36, then among the lowest in the world for production cars.
|
The 924 was a very influential car, and saved Porsche.
https://auto.howstuffworks.com/porsche-924-history2.htm
Quote:
|
In all, the 924 was distinctive and influential. Its nose, for instance, was aped by the Mazda RX-7 of 1978, and the new-for-’84 Chrysler Laser/Dodge Daytona coupes were unabashedly cut from the 924 pattern (as their G-24 project code suggested).
|
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects
2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft
You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
Last edited by kach22i; 10-15-2019 at 11:13 AM..
|