View Single Post
Old 10-21-2019, 12:21 PM   #211 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,743

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 85.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,471 Times in 3,436 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by All Darc View Post
[IMG]
Even if was a improvment, they lie, just lie, when they used to say LED had 178 degree of view angle !!!
I never watch TV from the same plane that it's hung, so extreme viewing angles mean nothing to me. In fact, I prefer a narrow viewing angle as it's inefficient to send light to corners of the room nobody is sitting. I'd be happy with a 90 degree field of view.

Quote:
Originally Posted by All Darc View Post
They should quite LCD, for good, instead of try to create different versions of it with the same old problems.
Funny that plasma is what the industry quit. They had excellent dynamic range.

Hopefully OLED comes down in price and durability improves. One thing though, OLED consumes more electricity than LCD, but I'm not sure why. LCD wastes the light not needed to produce an image while OLED simply produces the light that is needed, and nothing more.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote