View Single Post
Old 10-21-2019, 11:22 PM   #7617 (permalink)
NeilBlanchard
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,905

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,470
Thanked 2,946 Times in 1,841 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
It's been proven but you can't show where. Yeahhhhh.
So the answer is no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
I have what the ipcc puts in their reports.

It is a fact that that use 1850 to 1900 as their base line for "pre industrial climate".
That is a fact and that is the data the ipcc uses.

My counter argument is why use 1850 to 1900?
Why not run the clock back as far as the data will allow?
I don't think you can have a rational discussion about climate change with out getting emotional.
Listen to virtually ANY SCIENTIST about how serious this situation is. We have all the proof, and all the data shows that we are in deep trouble. The IPCC says this clearly.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
 
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
aerohead (10-23-2019), litesong (10-22-2019)