Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
I most definitely have the high ground.
It's not obsolete, it's junk science.
I think their reports would be better and less objectionable if they weren't so full of freshly picked cherries.
|
I'm unsure how a person of your credentials would be in a position to discern a corruption of the science.It implies a broad command of the literature,of which you've yet to demonstrate a command.You never actually say anything in a cogent,coherent,linear narrative,as would be found in a peer-reviewed argument.
I always sense confirmation bias in all your posts.Just an observation.If you desire to convince your audience to introspect their attitude towards the science,and win them over to a different way of thought,I'd recommend a scientific approach and supporting evidence.The ad hominem attacks are the domain of the coward.