View Single Post
Old 11-06-2019, 02:21 PM   #27 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,895

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 38.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,346
Thanked 4,501 Times in 3,462 Posts
It's all about signal to noise ratios. Being closer to the object in question increases signal and decreases noise. Sensors are getting better all the time though, so it wouldn't surprise me if one day cubesats can snap a decent picture of a small object (person).

Season 2 of Jack Ryan on Amazon has something to do with orbital imaging. I haven't finished so no spoilers please.

Drones make sense for surveillance since the cost is low, and the ability to repair or upgrade their equipment is very easy. They can be made very fuel efficient for long loiter times, especially since you don't have to design them to carry people.

Technology always tends to get used first for destructive purposes before it gets used for constructive purposes.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote