View Single Post
Old 11-26-2019, 08:19 PM   #31 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
What you are seeing is a revolution in manufacturability. Folding metal is cheaper than stamping it. No paint is cheaper than paint. Flat glass is cheaper than molded glass.
I'd call this a revolution in re aligning the market's expectations, accepting a vehicle that looks like the shoddiest third world kit car. Those ideas are not new - dozens of flat panel vehicles out there:

https://www.theverge.com/2016/9/11/1...mclaren-africa

My immediate thought was of these Hummer kits made locally a while back:





Paint is cheaper than no paint, but stainless is more expensive than mild steel+paint. I'd say it's more about saving the time involved in painting to ramp up production more quickly, plus no paint issues like they had with the 3. There's talk of vinyl wraps which of course are very expensive and time consuming...

__________________






  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
aerohead (11-27-2019)