Quote:
Originally Posted by All Darc
Funny how some quite cheper brands, compared to Samsung, looks quite "less worse" than ther garbage image of the Samsung 4K HDR here.
Even so they have too much motion blur, and some of it it's from the HD video cameras of today. Anywing... I will never accept such lie, with so many downsides .
Image change and it get blur, image change and it get more artifacts, image change and textures vanish aways.
|
The plasma had better picture quality, but this TV is bigger, and it's not much worse picture quality wise. I prefer the larger image over the marginally better picture quality. I don't watch much sports anyhow. It's mostly documentaries and streaming shows like The Mandalorian.
I'm sure the technology will get better. Perhaps OLED prices will approach LCD prices in 5 years. High end LCD is starting to challenge OLED, and in some aspects such as brightness and power efficiency, exceed it.
My question about how LCD is more efficient than OLED still hasn't been answered. LCD produces a bright white light and blocks (filters) out the colors not necessary for the image, while OLED only produces the light needed to produce the image, with none being wasted by filtering.
As a tangent subject, I don't know why huge viewing angles are desirable. Why are we sending light everywhere in the room? Are people really watching TV 80 degrees off center (from the side)? I'd be happy with solid light distribution out to about 45 degrees from center on both sides.