View Single Post
Old 01-20-2020, 06:32 PM   #5 (permalink)
jjackstone
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 404
Thanks: 35
Thanked 143 Times in 105 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post


... I probably average 13 kWh per day, and according to Tesla the small size would mostly cover that. It would be nice to go off-grid, but there's simply too many overcast days in a row to rely on battery power to get through those days. Quick math says the payback period would be about 15 years, which seems extreme.

If I ever did solar, I'd probably homebuild it to save money and for the experience.
Are you on the super cheap hydro-electric rates in your part of the country? Here in central California we are already paying over $.20/kwh base rate. It goes up quickly from there if you are anything but a low use user. Additionally, we obviously have more sun hours than you would so pay back time here can be as little as 7 or 8 years. The hard part is always the storage. Even at $100/kwh for storage I don't think I would ever break even unless I were grid connected and had more panels installed than I actually need to run the house.

But, some things are worth paying for even without economic return. I don't ride a bike, play baseball, or go to concerts because I'm looking for payback. I do those things because I enjoy them. I have panels and battery storage for the same reason. I enjoy the fact that I don't contribute as much to polluting the world and that I don't have to continuously pay someone else for all my energy usage.
JJ
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jjackstone For This Useful Post:
aerohead (01-22-2020), NeilBlanchard (01-22-2020)