View Single Post
Old 01-29-2020, 11:56 AM   #44 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,303
Thanks: 24,431
Thanked 7,383 Times in 4,781 Posts
volume

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird View Post
The big Columbia River dams don't have that much height to them, you can have height, or you can have volume. The turbines can be designed to work with either.

The new British Columbia hydro projects use the heights and lower volume and don't pool a reservoir at all. Well maybe a little one or just a diversion dam, then pipe the water down the mountain. Lots of pressure, not as much volume.
The turbine/generator load,plus internal wall friction of the inlet/outlet piping would introduce a flow restriction which would have to be overcome by the momentum of the water in order to produce any power;which in itself,would be dependent upon dynamic pressure of the rivers velocity. In the absence of additional gravity head,there would be a load point,beyond which the water would just stall behind the restriction,and the water would just flow around the penstock opening as if it were a choked-down valve.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (01-29-2020), Xist (01-29-2020)