View Single Post
Old 01-30-2020, 05:40 PM   #11 (permalink)
Galvatron1
Environmentalist
 
Galvatron1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: NYC
Posts: 74
Thanks: 136
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
Let's say the car needs a new battery at 200,000 miles. At $4k, that adds $0.02 per mile to the operating cost.

At 52 MPG and $3 gallon gas, the cost in fuel per mile is 0.06 per mile

At the non-hybrid 34 MPG and $3 gas, the fuel cost per mile is $0.09 per mile.

So, you've got a $0.03 per mile spread between the hybrid and non-hybrid version, with a battery perhaps costing only an extra $0.02 per mile. It still pencils out in the favor of a hybrid.

This particular vehicle aside, hybrid technology makes more sense the larger the vehicle becomes. It would be an absolute no-brainer to go hybrid in an SUV or truck, but makes no sense at all in the Gen I Insight, for instance.

The other thing is that hybrid technology is as much about improving performance as it is improving fuel efficiency. The upcoming RAV4 Prime is going to have 300+ horsepower making it the most powerful in its class, while also being the most fuel efficient.
The OP cites the hybrid vehicle requires premium fuel. Doesn't that bump it up to ~$0.45/gallon difference? It's more expensive than that if you factor in the environmental costs of mining that extra lithium, cobalt, etc. Not to mention the couple of extra thousands a hybrid cost over the regular version.


Last edited by Galvatron1; 01-30-2020 at 06:12 PM..
  Reply With Quote