View Single Post
Old 04-14-2020, 10:03 PM   #5 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
I had an LPG car a long time ago.

Basically LPG made (some) sense when cars had carbs or single point EFI. Most of today's cars cannot be aftermarket converted. Converting my '05 Jeep to LPG would have cost $6k, not many converters left at those prices.

Anything aftermarket is not as reliable as OEM.

LPG was OK when most people drove sedans with a fixed rear seat, where the tank could go against the seatback, with hatchbacks and SUV's a big tank in the load space is a massive issue, as you loose the ability to fold the seats for large cargo. Spare wheel replacement tanks are small and won't fit most cars with 'space savers' anyway.

Fewer miles per litre, offsets the lower cost of fuel to a degree. As newer cars are more optimised for the intended fuel, aftermarket conversions will lag more and more.

LPG is only popular if it's not taxed like petrol/ diesel. Here it's only taxed at 10c vs 50c (flat rate per litre, not %). If you do the math, at the same tax rate LPG would make no sense.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
MeteorGray (04-15-2020)