View Single Post
Old 04-28-2020, 08:18 PM   #26 (permalink)
Vman455
Moderator
 
Vman455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 1,939

Pope Pious the Prius - '13 Toyota Prius Two
Team Toyota
SUV
90 day: 51.62 mpg (US)

Tycho the Truck - '91 Toyota Pickup DLX 4WD
90 day: 22.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 199
Thanked 1,804 Times in 941 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by COcyclist View Post
The CFD was done without modeling turning wheels. Great article. Thanks.
Also, it should be noted that they did model wheel rotation. Under 18.2 Methodology:

Quote:
A complete moving ground plane was simulated using the sliding wall boundary condition, and the wheel rotation was included using a sliding mesh representation on all parts of the wheel except for the tyres, which had a rotating wall boundary condition applied.
And in the conclusion, they point out the error in the modeling of tire rotation specifically:

Quote:
The obvious discrepancy between the experimental setup and the computational is the axisymmetric modelling and lack of true rotation of the tyres in CFD. As no account is taken to the rotational shape changes, it will invariably have an effect on the computational results.
__________________
UIUC Aerospace Engineering
www.amateuraerodynamics.com
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vman455 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (04-29-2020), COcyclist (05-03-2020)