View Single Post
Old 05-13-2020, 11:15 AM   #51 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,754

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 57.45 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,472 Times in 3,437 Posts
The XL1 is a dud in just about every regard but 1.

It's a 2-seater. A vehicle lacking the utility of more seats had better be capable of 0-60 in under 3 seconds.

You can't see out the back, and it's not because of the utility offered by a large cargo area.

The doors are dumb. If you're going to have flashy doors, the car had better be capable of at least 200 MPH. Even then it's no excuse to have dumb doors.

69 horsepower is a joke. A $150,000 vehicle had better beat a Toyota Camry 0-60.

110 MPG. This thing is a science experiment. Nice getting 110 MPG, but then any EV gets that equivalent. Then there's the problem of diminishing returns. Who cares if a car gets 70 MPG or 110? It hardly matters from a fuel consumption perspective.

I'd like to see manufacturers adopt a shape more similar to this, but not at the expense of utility. I think Tesla strikes a good balance between efficiency and usability.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!

Last edited by redpoint5; 05-13-2020 at 11:36 AM..
  Reply With Quote