Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianEdgar
Your usual mix of red herrings, strawman arguments and irrelevant points.
Since they so comprehensively disprove your fallacious applications of theory, I would expect you to shortly suggest all on-road aero measurements are useless or deceptive. After all, you've already done that with tufting.
It must be a bit difficult when reality doesn't match your theories!
|
1) Losing all expectation about everything would be my first recommendation.
2) On-road measurements are what they are. I don't have a problem with your's, although they lack scientific rigor.
3) As to tufts, you don't understand what you're looking at. It's all explained by Hucho. You have his book. I don't understand why you don't understand it. I've recommended Schlichting, Hoerner, and Bernoulli Theorem (which is online ). You'll never understand the tufts until you master this material. And that's your problem. Don't make it ours.
4) My experience is, that my observations dovetail perfectly with the theories. The real ones.