View Single Post
Old 06-24-2020, 01:17 PM   #40 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
better

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4drviper View Post


Here are two videos visualizing vortex from delta shaped VG with the pointy side facing forward and backward.

I just need to find some tests to tell me which is "better".
1) there are around six (6) different types of VGs in existence.
2) of those six, there would be applications for:
* sub-boundary layer thickness VGs
* equa- boundary layer thickness VGs
* and extra- boundary layer thickness VGs
3) 'solutions' require empirical testing, they cannot be mathematically modeled.
Each of all VGs, under at least the three height categories would need to be investigated.
4) Zero-yaw and crosswind condition testing would be mandatory.
5) optimum number of VG testing is mandatory
6) optimum placement of VG testing is mandatory
7) all the testing would require a laboratory environment, with a single variable allowed, the VGs themselves.
Only under these conditions would data have any scientific merit.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
freebeard (06-24-2020), Joggernot (06-26-2020)