View Single Post
Old 08-11-2020, 08:26 PM   #72 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,445

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,209
Thanked 4,388 Times in 3,362 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
We should just ban studded tires and mandate winter tires be used in the winter.
That was my initial thought, but then my liberty filter kicked in and then my wondering about unforeseen unintended consequences.

I still like the idea of an extra tax to recoup the damage caused. If a set of studded tires costs $2,000 and a set of studdless is $600, we'll see a huge shift in that direction, and those that highly value studs can still have them since they've paid for the damage upfront. It would effectively be a ban without having outright banned them.

There'd still be those who purchase studded tires out of state or those from out of state with studded tires, but this might be a very low percent of people.

I dunno, I could be convinced to ban 'em. You just can't beat studs in ice though, and there might be certain areas particularly susceptible to icing.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote