View Single Post
Old 08-21-2020, 02:49 PM   #9 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,260
Thanks: 24,387
Thanked 7,359 Times in 4,759 Posts
representative

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
aerohead, I don't think that's very representative of what people are interested in. I don't see very many people going for tiny houses or compact cars anymore, regardless of the cost. You and I do not live in that country.

100mpg highway on gasoline is probably optimistic considering with a 46hp diesel and exotic materials it was only ~120mpg (rated).
No doubt, you're correct. Hedonic adaptation trumps reason.
As to fuel economy, the hybrid system wouldn't provide much mpg during steady-state highway cruising. That diesel would have been doing nearly all the work. Weight is virtually meaningless during highway driving. Even plain vanilla ICE technology of the mid-90s produced thermal efficiencies of 36% during highway driving. The difference in heat content between diesel and gasoline wouldn't be enough to knock mpg down remarkably.
I believe 100 mpg would be a walk in the park.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Ecky (08-21-2020), pete c (09-12-2020)