09-24-2008, 04:12 PM
|
#95 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
rush-hour
Quote:
Originally Posted by RH77
I was indeed a passenger during the "55" era, and it took a while to go 800 miles between parents -- especially in an '80 Caprice Classic coupe with the anemic 265-cid V-8 and no cruise control. $88 Braniff flights saved the day.
I've noticed a few things in this discussion -- the assumption that 55 is the target speed, and that efficiency decreases in Urban settings. What if we all went back to just 65 to start?
Just an observation -- I routinely drive in urban rush-hour slowdowns that force an average speed of 50mph. It isn't stop-n-go, but density increases. I get great FE during these periods due to slower speeds. Hills are harder to keep momentum, but entering/exiting traffic keep 2 of 3 lanes flowing smoothly.
Have others experienced this type of traffic flow?
RH77
|
We don't have that around here.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|