Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianEdgar
Get away from the PC and do some testing. You say you have the car - well, test it then.
Then we can compare, for the Insight:
- measured front and rear lift
- pressures above and below the car
- separated and attached flow patterns.
You'll find then that a great deal of what you say is simply wrong.
I am sorry, but this is largely meaningless in the context of the Insight. (Is 'burble point' another of your invented terms?)
Well, all that I can say is that you must have a quite limited experience in driving a variety of cars. I love the Insight, but to suggest that its on-road behaviour in standard form is good is just garbage. |
*At my age I can't imagine wasting the time on such folly. There are things way more important than this.
* If I'm wrong, then Hucho and all the rest are wrong.
* Ask Bernard what it is. He's the wing guy. He'll know.
* 'Garbage' is a non-quantifiable term. How does one quantify such a subjective 'metric'.? Such language has no place within a scientific discussion.
* Have you ever paused and considered the possibility that you may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer? Some of your brain vomit is incoherent, non-linear, contradictory, and some of the evidence you defend your thesis with only leads us to contrary conclusions. In your own Julian-speak, it's BS, Rubbish, and leads your reader astray.