View Single Post
Old 09-30-2020, 10:52 AM   #45 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,908
Thanks: 23,993
Thanked 7,227 Times in 4,654 Posts
vast majority

Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianEdgar View Post
In 2006 in that article I was writing for the readers of AutoSpeed, and many of them still drove cars where yes, separation occurred at the end of the roof on notchbacks. An example is the 1986-1988 Commodore VL turbo, a car that (in modified form) was then still very popular with readers. That car had a roof / rear window angle that dated back to 1978. In fact, the VL Group A Walkinshaw remains one of the best aero specials ever built, and to achieve attached flow on the bootlid, they had to raise it massively.

The reason that I nominate 1990 as the date from which notchback airflow largely changed is that by that year, most manufacturers were producing cars that had much shallower angle rear windows. (Of course, that refers to cars first produced from that year, not carryover old models.) Here in Australia that included the VN Commodore and EA Falcon, and the same happened elsewhere.

And of course, rear window angles have got shallower, and boot lids higher, ever since - such that today, a notchback's airflow is often closer to a fastback.

There is no doubt that when old aero references (and they include more than just Hucho 2nd edition) describe notchback flow, they are usually describing something quite different to today's notchback cars - and to the vast majority of notchbacks of the last 30 years.
' Vast majority' does not constitute 'ALL.'
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote