View Single Post
Old 09-30-2020, 02:58 PM   #43 (permalink)
redpoint5
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,479

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,218
Thanked 4,393 Times in 3,366 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hersbird View Post
But drawing 100hp takes half the amperage of 200hp. You will save battery the same way as if you were forced to only use 1/2 the accelerator.
The amount of energy required to accelerate to a given speed is the same regardless of how quickly you get there. There's practically no difference in efficiency (especially in an EV) getting up to 60 MPH in 3s vs 10s.

There's a reason why EVs are tilted towards being quick; and that's because the only downside is a marginal increase in cost, size, and weight for a more powerful motor. It hardly affects range at all.

In fact, Tesla's first performance version of the Model S was more efficient than the slower single motor version because it utilized a highly efficient "cruise" motor, and only used the inefficient "acceleration" motor when the extra power was needed.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
freebeard (09-30-2020)