Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianEdgar
Obviously! So my point is that it's of use only to people who want to use an old reference.
Ah, Aerohead and his habit of altering the meanings of words to suit himself. Attached flow that really isn't, things like that. Now 'production car' is the same as 'one-off concept car'. Amazing.
So what? You're talking production cars versus a one-off concept car. And even that argument fails because you have left out at least two production cars! What a weird argument.
What an odd thing to write.
Returns to personal insults. The veneer is paper-thin isn't it?
|
1) does anything about contemporary literature overturn the fluid mechanics fundamentals of the last 100-years that you can specifically identify?
2) whether the car was ever mass-produced or not doesn't alter the Cd. Quit steering the narrative onto something not germane to the topic.
3) the same year, 1975, U.S.E.P.A. researchers identified the 'template' roof contour as the only path to low drag. It's no different today.
4) in 1969, R.G.S. White, of MIRA gave us a recipe for Cd 0.245.
5) personal insults will continue, mirroring your precedent.
6) your defense of the Paris dressmakers must originate from an extremely myopic world view. It's extremely dangerous talk.