View Single Post
Old 10-09-2020, 04:36 PM   #2 (permalink)
JulianEdgar
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
For what it's worth,
I ran across an online paper by Douglass et al., from the University of Delaware, USA, in which they were still using the 10=5 rule-of-thumb as of 2006.
Hucho has something close to it in 1986. It's a bit more liberal for Diesel-powered vehicles.
William H. Bettes, used it in his researches in the Graduate Aerodynamic Laboratory California Institute of Technology ( GALCIT ) wind tunnel, reporting in 1982.
General Motors' Aerodynamics Laboratory was using it in the early 1990s.
'Highway' is not to be construed with 'EPA HWY' protocols.
There are plenty of references around that show otherwise. I've cited them before and I can't be bothered doing so again.

As soon as you see a rule of thumb like this in car modification - any type of car modification - you can be almost certain it's wrong.

Rules of thumb don't work well in car modification - especially numerically precise rules of thumb.

Last edited by JulianEdgar; 10-09-2020 at 06:13 PM.. Reason: typo
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JulianEdgar For This Useful Post:
aerohead (10-12-2020)