View Single Post
Old 10-10-2020, 04:46 PM   #3 (permalink)
freebeard
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 29,089
Thanks: 8,255
Thanked 9,020 Times in 7,453 Posts
Quote:
the 'ideal' form for a road vehicle is neither an axisymmetric teardrop nor a half teardrop, but a cambered version, slightly flattened on the underside, with the optimum geometry being dependent on the ground clearance.


My octahedral geodesic aeroform isn't a half teardrop, more of a Dymaxion. It's asymmetrical top to bottom and front to back. Supporting examples would be the fuselage of the ME-262 or Aeron26. The only changes I'd make today would be a concave truncation/boxed cavity or the Magic B*tt Trumpet.



In this case shown on a [mathematically definable] superelliptic cross-section rather than geodesic.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
____________________
.
.
What the headline giveth, the last paragraph taketh away. -- Scott Ott
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (10-10-2020)