Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman455
In my experience, those whose ideas can stand on their own do not have to resort to ad hominem attacks.
Barnard makes his living as a consulting aerodynamicist to automotive manufacturers, who are apparently perfectly happy to engage his expertise on their projects. He has a PhD in engineering. He was a lecturer in automotive and aerospace engineering at the University of Hertfordshire. Those credentials suggest he knows what he's talking about, yet you choose to overlook them and attack his intelligence anyway (as you have several times on this site, basically whenever any of his writings or comments are posted).
As far as English tutoring: "onto" != "on to."
|
It's not ad hominem attacks, this is just normal everyday speech conventions from Australia. Right?
It only feels like an attack when you're on the receiving end.
What's the lowest drag production automobile Bernard is associated with?
Perhaps Bernard will be better remembered for making a killing.
I'm certain that those PhDs at I.G. Farben, who succeeded in scaling up the commercial - production of Tesch und Stabenow's Zyklon-B for the Third Reich were highly credentialed.