View Single Post
Old 11-27-2020, 01:56 PM   #15 (permalink)
M_a_t_t
マット
 
M_a_t_t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Indiana
Posts: 718

The Van - '95 Chevy Astro Cl V8 Swapped
Team Chevy
90 day: 7.84 mpg (US)

The new bike - '17 Kawasaki Versys X 300 abs
Motorcycle
90 day: 71.94 mpg (US)

The Mercury - '95 Mercury Tracer Trio
Team Ford
90 day: 34.35 mpg (US)

Toyota - '22 Toyota Corolla Hatchback
90 day: 40.11 mpg (US)
Thanks: 131
Thanked 258 Times in 188 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianEdgar View Post
The aerofoil guide plates I made for the Insight's A pillars helped considerably in reducing the upward motion of the tufts on the side glass behind the pillars, so presumably reduced vortex formation from this source.

I tried corrugated egg cartons stuck vertically in front of the separation point on the side of the Insight ie designed to give more progressive separation and so reduce the pressure change. They didn't seem to work.



I don't know. But even when you can 'see' vehicle vortices (revealed by smoke, leaves, etc) they don't look anything like the idealised versions in the textbooks. I have a strong suspicion that much less is understood about these vortices than is often suggested. For example, I ran a large open mesh grid behind a car, the grid covered in tufts. The tufts revealed nothing.
Are you referring to this testing?



I'm having a hard time visualizing how you would've had the setup with the egg carton. Do you have a picture?

Interesting. Especially with the mesh.
__________________
1973 Fiat 124 Special
1975 Honda Civic CVCC 4spd
1981 Kawasaki KZ750E
1981 Kawasaki KZ650 CSR
1983 Kawasaki KZ1100-A3
1986 Nissan 300zx Turbo 5 spd
1995 Chevy Astro RWD (current project)
1995 Mercury Tracer
2017 Kawasaki VersysX 300
2022 Corolla Hatchback 6MT

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6s...LulDUQ8HMj5VKA
  Reply With Quote