View Single Post
Old 11-28-2020, 01:54 AM   #141 (permalink)
JulianEdgar
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
I experienced zero examples. Only self-delusion, from a phenomena explained scientifically, but summarily dismissed because it didn't fit the twisted worldview of Mr. Edgar and his 'wrapped flow.'
I use the term 'wrapping around curved surfaces' (and similar) to explain the low pressures that are generated when attached flow follows a convex surface*.

In an email to me last week, former head of Porsche aerodynamics, Dr Thomas Wolf, puts it this way:

"According to the Coanda-Effect the air follows the curved (upper) surface. According to Newton’s first law, there must be a force which pulls the air downwards. This force is exerted to the air by the car body and pulls the air downwards. According to Newton’s third law (action = reaction) there must be a force of the same magnitude in the opposite direction acting on the body."

But hey, what would Dr Wolf know?

Unfortunately, a lot of what Aerohead so steadfastly believes is simply wrong, as some simple on-car measurements very quickly shows. It's just a crying shame that Aerohead has so effectively mislead so many people here for so long.

(*The opposite happens with concave surfaces - high pressures are developed.)

 
The Following User Says Thank You to JulianEdgar For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-02-2020)