View Single Post
Old 12-02-2020, 08:17 AM   #14 (permalink)
Vekke
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,275

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 843 Times in 416 Posts
I just bougth yesterday my next efficiency test tires. They are Continental ContiEcoContact 5 in size 195/55 R20 95H XL. That means they have A rolling resistance. Many brands to choose for A level RR in this size.
- They are narrow so drag is lower.
- They are tall which also lowers RR

They can be fit to cars like Tesla Model S or Model Y, Audi A8D3 etc. I think best fit would be the a8 model weigth wise, but my plan is to test them on Tesla Model S. Estimated energy consumption reduction is 15-20% on the model S.
10% comes from aero of tire (width 195 vs 245 on Model S)
5% comes from lower RR
5% comes from aerodynamic wheels
I am at the moment searhing the best wheels to buy for the test. I have found a nice option for later use if and when the test works like I have estimated.

Minor problem is that maximum rear axle mass is 1500kg which is little bit more what the wheels or tires can at the moment handle. But if you know that then there is no problem to use these in model S.
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast

Last edited by Vekke; 12-02-2020 at 08:23 AM..
  Reply With Quote