Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianEdgar
No remember, earlier you were (rightly) insistent that published scientific research evidence is required.
You have referenced none here - the SAE paper on the Audi does not in any way mention a template of any sort (so you've obviously not read it).
So where is the published evidence showing that a template can be used to do these things:
- Show where there is separated and attached flow on existing cars
- Guide the shape of rear extensions
- Show how rear spoilers on sedans should be positioned and shaped
- Allow the assessment of the ‘aerodynamic purity’ of cars)
You'd expect the peer reviewed literature to be full of it.
|
I've already explained to you that I procured a blueprint for that vehicle, performed the dimensional analysis, which led to every conclusion I discussed.
Everything I said was backed up in Audi's SAE Paper. Which also shreds any credibility of your conclusions about the Porsche 911, nineteen pages later in your book. Which was corroborated by Dr. Thomas Wolf's testimony.
