Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
words of a seemingly complete coward. Terrified to reveal their manifest ignorance of aerodynamics. Forever hiding under the skirts of others, incapable of defending their thesis in their own tongue. Pitiful! Ignorant. Illogical. Irrational. Incoherent. Defies physical law. Disrespect of all, then feigns surprise when receives push-back, as if everyone else is presumed spineless, and as impotent. Hypocritical. Left hand doesn't know what the right hand is doing.
Want low drag? Don't follow Julian Edgar.
|
You seemed to have lost the thread in your tirades of personal abuse.
What we're asking for is evidence in any current technical aerodynamic literature that supports the way you use your template, viz:
- Show where there is separated and attached flow on existing cars
- Guide the shape of rear extensions
- Show how rear spoilers on sedans should be positioned and shaped
- Allow the assessment of the ‘aerodynamic purity’ of cars
So far, you haven't provided any evidence - and neither has anyone else. Not much of a surprise when all purported uses are absurd.
It's just a crying shame that so many people here have been sucked in by such rubbish.