View Single Post
Old 12-07-2020, 10:19 PM   #1 (permalink)
oldtamiyaphile
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Solar panel results

I had to remove the solar panels from my van earlier this year. 2x180W panels. 180A Smart alt, stop-start, 1.6 diesel.

So I've compared the last six fill ups from this year without panels vs same period last year with panels.

Results:

Without solar panels: 7.55l/100km (31.15MPG)

With panels: 7.24l/100km (32.5MPG)

So approximately a 5% improvement. It's probably greater than that as I was still running one panel, but due to a wiring issue it was only putting out 10-20Wh/day at best. It was completely disconnected about half way through. I was also occasionally grid charging the battery.

Since a 180A alt can be a pretty big draw on a 1.6l engine, having a solar charged battery makes the van noticeably more lively at low revs.

I believe I'm the only one on here that's shown an improvement from solar panels in an otherwise stock vehicle (no alt. delete).

5% is a pretty long payback but there's also less battery deg, belt wear, alt wear, and you'll never come out to a flat battery in the morning.

__________________






  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
Isaac Zachary (12-16-2020), Stubby79 (12-08-2020)