View Single Post
Old 12-11-2020, 03:57 PM   #3 (permalink)
JulianEdgar
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Kamm / Koenig-Fachsenfeld were able to reproduce Walter E. Lay's,1933, Cd 0.12, with an otherwise identical model, excepting for a cambered, aft-body roofline addition, compared to Lay's straight taper, beyond the lead-in curvature.
I am not sure what you are talking about? But drag figures on small models in the 1930s are notoriously inaccurate, so to use still more of them in support of something isn't a great idea!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JulianEdgar For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-11-2020)