View Single Post
Old 12-22-2020, 03:27 PM   #30 (permalink)
aerohead
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,363 Times in 4,763 Posts
where

Quote:
Originally Posted by JulianEdgar View Post
That's not what you said last time, is it? Just to remind you, you wrote:

"Low pressure, existing over any horizontal surface will impart lift.
Porsche's Macan would be an example. Mitsubishi's Mirage 'G' model would not.
And the separation is implicated in the Macan's Cd 0.37, vs the Mirage's Cd 0.27. Same basic roofline. One with separation, one without."

Separation over a horizontal surface. So, where is it?





Where is this separation occurring in the wind tunnel smoke flow? It isn't. You are again just making up stuff to suit your theories.
1) the flow separates where the truncated roof ends. You can see the streamlines continue on and the void left underneath.
2) the pressure in that void has the pressure imparted by the streamlines directly above the TBL at the point of separation.
3) since this low pressure region occurs 'over' the rear of the body below the void , it's imparting lift. Just like Taycan, Panamera, Cayman, 911,.........
4) this low pressure is also connected to the wake, lowering base pressure, increasing pressure drag, increasing overall drag.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5) And observing those streamlines that have left the Porsche, had the roofline continued on, following the streamlined path, they'd be underneath more widely-spaced streamlines.
6) velocity would be lower there, by definition.
7) lower static pressure above the panel would be higher.
8) lift would be reduced.
9) if the body were extended to full verjungungsverhaltnis, the local streamlines would be at maximum- spacing, lowest velocity, highest pressure, lowest lift, lowest drag.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote