Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
1) your assumption is incorrect.
2) no one has established the veracity of your claim of 'misinformation'
3) if you'll please publish, in your own tongue, a scientific rebuttal, which overturns the logic of my argument, you'll immediately have an apology, and a thanks for finally moving the ball down the court. I haven't been 'corrected' so far as I can discern.
4) none of your references possess such information.
5) a clarification between page - 186 of your book, and page-195 of your book would be a great contribution, as they contradict one another.
|
In addition to me, there have been at least two other people correcting you and citing references that show your misunderstandings. In all cases you simply ignore what has been said and don't read the references.
If you have a specific criticism of my book, by all means spell it out.