View Single Post
Old 12-23-2020, 03:52 PM   #26 (permalink)
JulianEdgar
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
1) Science doesn't concern itself with 'wrongness.'
2) There's no such thing as too much information.
3) If certain evidence disagrees with a premise, that premise needs to be examined.
4) I beg you to illustrate where I said anything at all.
5) I simply reached into my archive and presented a reference to visual information which would qualify for ' hey, look at this- isn't it interesting ?'
I'd already made it clear what the incorrect information was, but here it is again. You wrote:

That's my take, at least on supercars. Ferrari has flaps that lower to a less radical angle on the straights, where cornering force isn't as important, then on approach to turns, the flaps lift, increasing the ramp angle, allowing low base pressure to communicate under the diffuser. Online, there are photographs of a Lamborghini configured for this and the tufts indicate forwards airflow down and under the car, heading for the suction peak at the venturi.

Low base pressure doesn't communicate under the diffuser - that's not how diffusers work. It's similar to the idea that you have that lift is caused only by separation on the upper surfaces of cars.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JulianEdgar For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-23-2020)