View Single Post
Old 12-27-2020, 11:36 PM   #11 (permalink)
JulianEdgar
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,060
Thanks: 107
Thanked 1,605 Times in 1,136 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman455 View Post
Now that's interesting!

I measured pressures down the side of the car and in the wake with air curtain ducts (front and rear, but a different design from Julian's, made of sheet metal). I found no change on the doors and wake (both directions showed exactly the same pressure with and without ducts), but a +10 Pa difference on the (tapered) bumper cover behind the rear wheels. Fuel economy testing suggests that overall the ducts are reducing drag slightly; I wonder if this is how?
Yes, very interesting - and thanks for reminding me.

But if we look at the angle of that rear bumper taper, and do a forward force triangle diagram from that increase in pressure, it has to be really tiny ie the taper wouldn't be more than about 10 degrees, would it?

But I can certainly see a change in pressure there having an influence on the wake pattern.

I posted my video to Linkedin, and I have some contacts there who are professional aero people - both CFD and wind tunnel. I've asked if they have any ideas about the relationship between side pressures / degree of attachment and resulting drag.

I just always took it on face value that 'improved side flow attachment = lower drag' but like all aspects of car aero, the more you think about it, the less you realise you know.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JulianEdgar For This Useful Post:
aerohead (12-29-2020)