Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
1) I did post material.
2) I provided the date of publication as a historical reference.
3) I provided a reference to a history that I share with Mr. Scharpf.
4) I attributed the relationship to Mr. Scharpf and a speculation as to its GM Aerodynamics Laboratory. ( GM has published other metrics like this, so there is a probability after the fact ).
5) The qualifications, caveats, conditions, are provided.
6) 'deliberately' implies that you possess my intent. That is unknowable, and the use of that kind of language can land you in a courtroom.
7) 'Mislead' can land you in a courtroom.
8) This topic has garnered interest. Providing a historical context is simply informational.
9) If the eye offends thee, pluck it out. Pluck it out.
|
You provided no qualifications, caveats or conditions on readers here using this 'rule' on their cars.
You just endlessly repeat the same stuff, attempting to justify whatever you've written in the past.
I think you are the number one source of misinformation on this subforum. You achieve that by a number of mechanisms.
1. Outright error (recent example - Reynolds Numbers)
2. Ignorance (recent example - what a TPS does in an engine management system)
3. Misleading posts (recent example - posting historic data without pointing out it may not be relevant to people modifying their cars today).