View Single Post
Old 02-22-2021, 05:11 PM   #7 (permalink)
kach22i
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,178
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
What would you think of pedestrian-friendly thrusters/propulsors for a hovercraft?
We think alike, I started immediately thinking how this could be applied to hovercraft thrust.

Efficiency is such a big deal it's hard to beat what's out there.

Safety, noise, control and lower overall profile (to get under bridges) and other factors certainly are areas for improvement.

In the end; weight (efficiency) and skirt longevity factors (maintenance overhead) rule the day.

For the military, getting somewhere in the middle of the night during a ruckus storm for cover is idea, and hovercraft fall short in many ways. They just don't like heavy seas.

If this type of propulsion has an advantage in high winds by lowering the profile and having less moving parts giving off a radar signature or sucking sailors into fans (they cover the LCAC propellers with big nets now) then I can see this technology being put to future use.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
freebeard (02-22-2021)