View Single Post
Old 03-18-2021, 02:08 PM   #38 (permalink)
jakobnev
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,633

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 703 Times in 446 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Quote:
because the only scenario solar on a car makes sense is for those who don't have reasonable access to a petrol station or mains electricity
Even with access to petrol stations it makes sense if the price of gas is high enough, from post #12:

Quote:
And assuming $0.13/kWh at home we could lose this much of the potential energy and still be better off with the panel on the car than at home (assuming we are unable to plug the car in):

Europe: 83%
Hawaii/California: 65%
Texas: 38%

Of course there are more costs than just the panel, but that is also true at home.
And there is another thing going on in Europe right now, a car that emits 10g/km less CO2 has €950 less penalty applied to it, that alone would pay for a significant solar system on a car.
__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote